Naturalism and Causal Explanation
نویسنده
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Entry title:
100-word abstract §1 gives a preliminary explanation of the concept of reference. §2 is an analysis of descriptivism, the first systematic theory of reference. §3 begins with criticisms of descriptivism, and then details the development of the causal-historical theory of reference, which has been the orthodox view of reference since the 1970s. §4 is an exposition of three concepts that play maj...
متن کاملFoundational Grounding and the Argument From Contingency∗
The argument from contingency for the existence of God is best understood as a request for an explanation of the total sequence of causes and effects in the universe (‘History’ for short). Many puzzles about how there could be such an explanation arise from the assumption that God is being introduced as one more cause prepended to the sequence of causes that (allegedly) needed explaining. In re...
متن کاملIntroduction: the explanation of behaviour. One of the main questions to be resolved in Cognitive Science is in what form and at what level of abstraction should the explanation of behaviour in man and animals
This paper has three distinct parts. First we will explore some issues concerning the nature of behaviour and its explanation in terms of causes. We will argue in favour of recognising the multiplicity of causal explanation, in particular teleological explanation, rather than classifying all non-standard causes as emergent properties with no causal power. In the second part will summarise a the...
متن کاملQuining Naturalism
Scientific naturalism is a metaphysical doctrine, a view about what there is, or what we ought to believe that there is. It maintains that natural science should be our guide in matters metaphysical: the ontology we should accept is the ontology that turns out to be required by science. Quine is often regarded as the doyen of scientific naturalists, though the supporting cast includes such gian...
متن کاملNaturalism , Evidence and Creationism : The Case of Phillip Johnson
Phillip Johnson claims that Creationism is a better explanation of the existence and characteristics of biological species than is evolutionary theory. He argues that the only reason biologists do not recognize that Creationist's negative arguments against Darwinism have proven this is that they are wedded to a biased ideological philosophy Naturalism which dogmatically denies the possibility o...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2006